<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0">   <channel>      <title>Investment Claims News</title>      <link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/</link>      <description>Investment Claims News RSS Feed</description>      <item><date>20 January 2012</date><title>Republic of Argentina v BG Group PLC, Appeal judgment, USCA 11-7021; IIC 520 (2012)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-520-2012</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Preliminary proceedings  -  Waiting period—attempt to settle in domestic courts for period of time  -  Review of arbitral awards  -  Judicial review of arbitral awards</description></item>
<item><date>20 January 2012</date><title>El Paso Energy International Company v Argentina, Award, ICSID Case no ARB/03/15; IIC 519 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-519-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Attribution  -  Ultra Vires conduct, necessity, emergency  -  Investment  -  Investor  -  Control  -  Indirect ownership  -  Standards of treatment  -  Arbitrary (unreasonable) &amp; discriminatory treatment standard  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Expropriation  -  Indirect expropriation  -  Remedies and costs  -  Damages</description></item>
<item><date>09 January 2012</date><title>Italy v Cuba, Interim award, Ad hoc state-state arbitration (Italy/Cuba BIT); IIC 518 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-518-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Admissibility  -  Exhaustion of local remedies  -  Investment  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>Roussalis v Romania, Award, ICSID Case no ARB/06/1; IIC 516 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-516-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Conduct of proceedings  -  Dissenting opinion  -  Claims  -  Counterclaims  -  Tax claim  -  Investment  -  Investment ‘in accordance with host state law’  -  Standards of treatment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  Expropriation  -  Remedies and costs</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>Apotex Inc v United States, Procedural order no 2, IIC 517 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-517-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Conduct of proceedings  -  Third party participation</description></item>
<item><date>19 December 2011</date><title>HICEE B V v The Slovak Republic, Supplementary and final award, PCA Case No 2009-11; IIC 515 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-515-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Arbitrators  -  Challenge to appointment of arbitrator  -  Remedies and costs  -  Costs and expenses</description></item>
<item><date>12 December 2011</date><title>HICEE B V v The Slovak Republic, Partial Award, PCA Case No 2009–11; IIC 514 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-514-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Conduct of proceedings  -  Dissenting opinion  -  Investment  -  Investor  -  Indirect ownership  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Standards of treatment  -  Most-favoured-nation, jurisdictional matters  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</description></item>
<item><date>21 November 2011</date><title>Hochtief AG v Argentina, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No ARB/07/31, IIC 513 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-513-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Preliminary proceedings  -  Waiting period—attempt to settle in domestic courts for period of time  -  Investor  -  Minority ownership  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Standards of treatment  -  Most-favoured-nation, procedural matters</description></item>
<item><date>18 November 2011</date><title>EVN AG v Macedonia, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/09/10; IIC 512 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-512-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Conduct of proceedings  -  Settlement &amp; discontinuance</description></item>
<item><date>14 October 2011</date><title>Continental Casualty Company v Argentina, Decision on Application for Partial Annulment, ICSID Case No ARB/03/9, IIC 511 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-511-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Review of arbitral awards  -  Annulment (ICSID)  -  Failure to state reasons  -  Manifest excess of power  -  Serious departure from fundamental rule of procedure  -  Attribution  -  Ultra Vires conduct, necessity, emergency</description></item>
<item><date>12 October 2011</date><title>Mexico v Cargill, Inc, Appeal of Ontario Superior Court decision, 2011 ONCA 622; IIC 510 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-510-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Review of arbitral awards  -  Judicial review of arbitral awards  -  Standard of Review (Canada)  -  Remedies and costs  -  Damages</description></item>
<item><date>26 September 2011</date><title>Binder v Czech Republic, Award on Jurisdiction, IIC 508 (2007)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-508-2007</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Investor  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Treaties, interpretation</description></item>
<item><date>26 September 2011</date><title>Nations Energy Inc and ors v Panama, Decisión sobre la Propuesta de Recusación del Dr Stanimir A Alexandrov (Annulment Proceeding), ICSID Case No ARB/06/19; IIC 509 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-509-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Arbitrators  -  Challenge to appointment of arbitrator</description></item>
<item><date>20 September 2011</date><title>Italy v Cuba, Final Award, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, IIC 507 (2008)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-507-2008</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Preliminary proceedings  -  Exhaustion of local remedies  -  Investment  -  Investor  -  Standards of treatment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  National treatment  -  Expropriation</description></item>
<item><date>12 September 2011</date><title>Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Company v Ecuador, Final award, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 505 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-505-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Remedies and costs  -  Compensation  -  Costs and expenses  -  Damages  -  Interest</description></item>
<item><date>12 September 2011</date><title>Libananco Holdings Co Limited v Turkey, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/06/8; IIC 506 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-506-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Evidence  -  Investor  -  Denial of benefits clause  -  Investment  -  Shareholding  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Burden of proof (and jurisdiction)  -  Consent to jurisdiction  -  Reservations and exceptions  -  Standard of review</description></item>
<item><date>22 August 2011</date><title>Brandes Investment Partners, LP v Venezuela, Final award, ICSID Case No ARB/08/3; IIC 503 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-503-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Consent to jurisdiction through legislation</description></item>
<item><date>18 August 2011</date><title>Sedelmayer v Russian Federation, Execution of enforcement measure, Case No 170-10; IIC 502 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-502-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Review of arbitral awards  -  Enforcement of award  -  Remedies and costs  -  Costs and expenses  -  Enforcement  -  Enforcement in domestic courts</description></item>
<item><date>17 August 2011</date><title>ATA Construction, Industrial and Trading Company, Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding (annulment proceeding), ICSID Case No ARB/08/2; IIC 500 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-500-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Conduct of proceedings  -  Settlement &amp; discontinuance  -  Review of arbitral awards  -  Annulment (ICSID)</description></item>
<item><date>17 August 2011</date><title>Tza Yap Shum v Peru, Final award, ICSID Case No ARB/07/6; IIC 501 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-501-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Measure  -  Tax measures  -  Expropriation  -  Indirect expropriation  -  Police powers (expropriation and)  -  Remedies and costs  -  Compensation  -  Discounted cash flow (DCF), anticipated future profits</description></item><item><date>20 January 2012</date><title>Plama Consortium Limited v Bulgaria, Award, ICSID Case no ARB/03/24; IIC 338 (2008)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-338-2008</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Attribution  -  Claims  -  Tax claim  -  Investment  -  Investment ‘in accordance with host state law’  -  Standards of treatment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  Good faith  -  Non-discrimination  -  Expropriation</description></item>
<item><date>19 January 2012</date><title>Abaclat and ors v Argentina, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, ICSID Case No ARB/07/5; IIC 504 (2011)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-504-2011</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Preliminary proceedings  -  Waiting period—attempt to settle in domestic courts for period of time  -  Waiting period—negotiations  -  Parallel proceedings  -  Consolidation of claims  -  Conduct of proceedings  -  Settlement &amp; discontinuance  -  Admissibility  -  Claims  -  Treaty claim  -  Investment  -  Financial instruments  -  Investment ‘in accordance with host state law’  -  Investor  -  Nationality of investor, individuals  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Consent to jurisdiction  -  Parties to the dispute (and jurisdiction)  -  Standard of review  -  Subject matter of the dispute (and jurisdiction)  -  Remedies and costs  -  Costs and expenses</description></item>
<item><date>11 January 2012</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Award on costs, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Rules; IIC 196 (2002)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-196-2002</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Remedies and costs  -  Costs and expenses</description></item>
<item><date>10 January 2012</date><title>Czech Republic v CME Czech Republic BV, Judgment of the Svea Court of Appeal, T 8735-01, IIC 63 (2003)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-63-2003</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Parallel proceedings  -  Lis alibi pendens  -  Res judicata  -  Conduct of proceedings  -  Dissenting opinion  -  Review of arbitral awards  -  Failure to apply applicable law  -  Judicial review of arbitral awards  -  Applicable law  -  Choice of law  -  Relationship of international law &amp; host state law</description></item>
<item><date>09 January 2012</date><title>Rumeli Telekom AS and Telsim Mobil Telekomikasyon Hizmetleri AS v Kazakhstan, Award, ICSID Case no ARB/05/16; IIC 344 (2008)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-344-2008</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Parallel proceedings  -  Consolidation of claims  -  Claims  -  Corruption claim  -  Standards of treatment  -  Arbitrary (unreasonable) &amp; discriminatory treatment standard  -  Coercion &amp; harassment  -  Denial of justice  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  International minimum standard  -  Most-favoured-nation, substantive matters  -  Non-discrimination  -  Transparency  -  Expropriation  -  Creeping expropriation  -  Remedies and costs  -  Compensation  -  Costs and expenses  -  Damages</description></item>
<item><date>09 January 2012</date><title>CME Czech Republic BV v Czech Republic, Partial award and separate opinion, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, IIC 61 (2001)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-61-2001</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Conduct of proceedings  -  Dissenting opinion  -  Standards of treatment  -  Coercion &amp; harassment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  Non-discrimination  -  Expropriation  -  Indirect expropriation</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>EDF International SA and ors v Argentina, Challenge Decision Regarding Professor Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, ICSID Case No ARB/03/23; IIC 353 (2008)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-353-2008</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Arbitral rules &amp; institutions  -  ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes)  -  Arbitrators  -  Challenge to appointment of arbitrator  -  Replacement of arbitrator</description></item>
<item><date>06 January 2012</date><title>BG Group plc v Argentina, Final award, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 321 (2007)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-321-2007</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Applicable law  -  Express choice of law  -  Investor  -  Indirect ownership  -  Standards of treatment  -  Arbitrary (unreasonable) &amp; discriminatory treatment standard  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  International minimum standard  -  Legitimate expectations  -  Expropriation  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Object &amp; purpose (treaty interpretation and)  -  Remedies and costs  -  Damages  -  Interest</description></item>
<item><date>02 November 2011</date><title>Paushok and ors v Mongolia, Order on Interim Measures, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 351 (2008)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-351-2008</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Arbitral rules &amp; institutions  -  UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules  -  Conduct of proceedings  -  Interim measures</description></item>
<item><date>01 November 2011</date><title>Hrvatska elektroprivreda dd v Slovenia, Decision on the Treaty interpretation issue, ICSID Case no ARB/05/24; IIC 377 (2009)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-377-2009</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Treaties, interpretation  -  Good faith  -  Object &amp; purpose (treaty interpretation and)  -  Official interpretations by the parties  -  Ordinary meaning (treaty interpretation and)  -  Rules of treaty interpretation  -  Travaux préparatoires  -  Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</description></item>
<item><date>31 October 2011</date><title>Romak SA v Uzbekistan, Award, PCA Case No AA280; IIC 400 (2009)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-400-2009</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Investment  -  Investment defined in treaties  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Subject matter of the dispute (and jurisdiction)  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Object &amp; purpose (treaty interpretation and)  -  Ordinary meaning (treaty interpretation and)</description></item>
<item><date>10 October 2011</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Award on damages, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 195 (2002)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-195-2002</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Standards of treatment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  International minimum standard  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Travaux préparatoires  -  Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties  -  Remedies and costs  -  Compensation  -  Damages  -  Interest</description></item>
<item><date>06 October 2011</date><title>Caratube International Oil Company, LLP, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Memorandum opinion, misc action no 10-0285 (JDB); IIC 449 (2010)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-449-2010</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Evidence  -  Production of documents</description></item>
<item><date>03 October 2011</date><title>SD Myers Inc v Canada, Order, 2004 FC 38; IIC 252 (2004)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-252-2004</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Arbitral rules &amp; institutions  -  UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules  -  UNCITRAL Model Law  -  Review of arbitral awards  -  Public policy (Canada, Standard of Review)  -  Standard of Correctness (Canada)  -  Standard of Review (Canada)  -  Investment  -  Investment defined in treaties  -  Investor  -  Indirect ownership  -  Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals  -  Consent to jurisdiction  -  Consent to jurisdiction through treaties  -  Standard of review  -  Standards of treatment  -  National treatment, in like circumstances (or likeness)  -  Non-discrimination  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Rules of treaty interpretation</description></item>
<item><date>30 September 2011</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Rules concerning the Investor's motion to change the place of arbitration, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 194 (2002)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-194-2002</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Place of arbitration</description></item>
<item><date>28 September 2011</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Interim award, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 192 (2000)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-192-2000</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Standards of treatment  -  Performance requirements  -  Expropriation  -  Indirect expropriation  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</description></item>
<item><date>28 September 2011</date><title>Pope &amp; Talbot Inc v Canada, Award on the merits of phase 2, ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 193 (2001)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-193-2001</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Standards of treatment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  International minimum standard  -  National treatment  -  National treatment, aims and effect test  -  National treatment, de facto treatment  -  National treatment, de jure treatment  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</description></item>
<item><date>16 September 2011</date><title>SD Myers Inc v Canada, First Partial Award and Separate Opinion, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 249 (2000)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-249-2000</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Investment  -  Investment defined in treaties  -  Investor  -  Control  -  Ownership  -  Standards of treatment  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  International minimum standard  -  National treatment  -  Non-discrimination  -  Expropriation  -  Expropriatory environmental measures  -  Indirect expropriation  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Good faith  -  Rules of treaty interpretation</description></item>
<item><date>19 July 2011</date><title>SD Myers Inc v Canada, Second Partial Award, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 250 (2002)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-250-2002</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Remedies and costs  -  Compensation  -  Damages  -  Interest  -  Interest, compound/simple  -  Valuation</description></item>
<item><date>18 July 2011</date><title>CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/01/8; IIC 65 (2005)</title><link>http://www.investmentclaims.com:80/Subscriber_Article?id=/ic/Awards/law-iic-65-2005</link><description>Subject(s):  International investment law Keyword(s):  Evidence  -  Burden of proof  -  Applicable law  -  Choice of law  -  Customary international law  -  Relationship of international law &amp; host state law  -  Treaty provisions  -  Attribution  -  Ultra Vires conduct, necessity, emergency  -  Claims  -  Contract claims  -  Direct claims  -  Indirect claims  -  Treaty claim  -  Umbrella clause  -  Standards of treatment  -  Arbitrariness  -  Arbitrary (unreasonable) &amp; discriminatory treatment standard  -  Fair and equitable treatment standard  -  Full protection and security  -  Good faith  -  International minimum standard  -  Legitimate expectations  -  Most-favoured-nation treatment (MFN)  -  Most-favoured-nation, substantive matters  -  Non-discrimination  -  Transparency  -  Expropriation  -  Creeping expropriation  -  Expropriation of contract rights  -  Indirect expropriation  -  Investment-backed expectations (expropriation and)  -  Treaties, interpretation  -  Authority of previous decisions (precedents)  -  Ejusdem generis rule  -  Good faith  -  Object &amp; purpose (treaty interpretation and)  -  Remedies and costs  -  Costs and expenses  -  Damages  -  Date of valuation  -  Depreciated replacement value method  -  Discounted cash flow (DCF), anticipated future profits  -  Interest  -  Interest, rate of  -  Interest, compound/simple  -  Interest, post-award  -  Interest, pre-award  -  Interest, temporal aspects  -  Restitution  -  Valuation</description></item>   </channel></rss>
